![]() If it were me, I would have merely integrated GTD options into OP, but then the purists from both ends would have likely complained. For more complicated cases, one groups actions and action groups to express a hybrid structure. For simpler cases, a project or action group (which is not a sub-project) will be composed entirely of either parallel or sequential actions and thus marking a project or action group as either parallel or sequential is the right choice, rather than having to individually mark each action as one or the other. Simply identifying a task as sequential or not is not sufficient to unambiguously describe all potential combinations of parallel and sequential tasks. Tasks should be identified as sequential or not not entire projects (or sub projects). ![]() So I need to create a group so OF can manage this logically? For project A I have 5 tasks 4 need to be done in order and one can be done anytime. ![]() I suspect it is related more to intitial software design. Not sure why they need to do this as this (establishing these groups) is not required in Project Mgt. I assume they (in part) established groups to allow for sequential and non-sequential tasks to be in the same project.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |